{
"subject": "Re: URI-scheme for bitcoin",
"content": {
"format": "html",
"body": "<div class=\"post\"><a href=\"http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345\">http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=domain.com&amount=200.00&comment=order_12345</a><br/>or<br/><a href=\"http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=\">http://127.0.0.1:8330/?to=</a><bitcoinaddress><separatorchar>1.2.3.4&amount=200.00<br/><br/>But as long as the link is already doing the typing for you, I don't see much benefit in using a domain address instead of bitcoin address. With a bitcoin address, the user can't send an unidentified payment. They can't send payment until they've been given a correct bitcoin address to send to.<br/><br/>What would be nice about sending by domain is you could visually verify who it's going to.<br/><br/><br/>A more crucial issue is what if the browser isn't allowed to connect to 127.0.0.1:<br/><a href=\"http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589\">http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=63.msg1589#msg1589</a><br/><br/>and if that's true, then what about that example freenet link that had 127.0.0.1 in it?</div>"
},
"source": {
"name": "Bitcoin Forum",
"url": "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55.msg1596#msg1596"
},
"date": "2010-06-16T00:15:47Z"
}