{
"subject": "Re: Development of alert system",
"content": {
"format": "html",
"body": "<div class=\"post\"><div class=\"quoteheader\"><a href=\"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg11162#msg11162\">Quote from: BioMike on August 25, 2010, 06:23:45 PM</a></div><div class=\"quote\"><div class=\"quoteheader\"><a href=\"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg11155#msg11155\">Quote from: satoshi on August 25, 2010, 04:56:15 PM</a></div><div class=\"quote\"><div class=\"quoteheader\"><a href=\"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg10742#msg10742\">Quote from: BioMike on August 23, 2010, 05:15:43 AM</a></div><div class=\"quote\">So, theoretical this is a first control system where <some goverment> can arrest satoshi and demand <br/>that he hands over his key (or get it from his computer) and shut down the complete network?<br/><br/>Or is that not possible? How far would <some goverment> get?<br/></div>This is what makes me think the people objecting don't know what they're talking about. It can't \"shut down the complete network\". <br/></div>I've never objected this change/idea, just asking if this was possible and to what extent.<br/>What's wrong with getting informed? <img alt=\"Wink\" border=\"0\" src=\"https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif\"/><br/></div>My apologies, your post was indeed a question not a statement.<br/></div>"
},
"source": {
"name": "Bitcoin Forum",
"url": "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=898.msg11219#msg11219"
},
"date": "2010-08-26T00:08:12Z"
}